Name without a product
What is DeepNude?
The short-lived 2019 program and the paid services now using its name.
Short answer
What is DeepNude today is a search term rather than a product. It began as a desktop program for Windows and Linux released in 2019, whose author withdrew it four days later, and nothing has inherited it since — no company holds the name and no successor build was ever published. Six paid web services now trade under the word, charging ₱0.30 to ₱19 a picture.
That gap between the name and the product is what most of the confusion on this subject comes from, and it is worth closing before any money moves.
The original
What the DeepNude program actually was
A piece of desktop software, sold once, that ran entirely on the buyer's own machine.
It was a program, not a service. There was no account, no server and no balance to top up: it installed on a computer and did its work there. That single fact separates it from everything sold under the name now, all of which computes remotely and bills per attempt.
It was sold in two versions. The free build stamped its output with a watermark; the paid one, at fifty dollars, replaced that with a smaller mark reading FAKE in the corner. There was no subscription, because there was nothing on the other end to subscribe to.
Its author took it down himself. The program was withdrawn in June 2019, days after release, with a statement that the world was not ready for it. Nobody bought the project and nobody continued it — which is why every claim of official descent made today was made after the fact: how to sort the domains.
From program to category
Four stages between 2019 and now
The name travelled further than the software ever did, and it travelled in four recognisable steps.
Released and withdrawn
Four days between publication and shutdown, with no successor and no transfer of the project to anyone else. Everything after this point is unrelated work by unrelated people.
The copies got loose
Files that had already been downloaded were repackaged and re-signed repeatedly, and code hosting services later removed repositories carrying them: what those download pages hand over today.
The work moved to servers
Running an image model locally needs tens of gigabytes of weights and a graphics card bought for the purpose, so the category shifted to rented hardware and started charging by the piece.
The word became a keyword
It now works as a query that paid services, chat handles and store shells attach themselves to because it brings traffic: why the labels keep changing.
What the word buys now
Three services that publish a price before you sign up
None of these has any connection to the 2019 program; all three are ordinary paid websites. Order follows the editorial scale used across this guide.
-
1Cheapest per runUndresswith
About ₱4 a picture on the ₱1,260 entry pack of 33,000 gems, ₱1.60 at the US$199.99 tier, with the whole ladder readable before you register. Gems carry no expiry date and an uploaded file is held twenty-four hours before deletion.
-
2Smallest entryAinudez
₱630 buys 500 credits and a picture costs 15 of them, the same on every larger pack — thirty-three attempts settled in advance. Clips come off the same balance at 50 to 300 credits up to 720p and seven seconds, and a complaint is answered within five working days.
-
3Card at checkoutWaveSpeed
Prices each model it rents separately, ₱0.30 to ₱8.80 a run, and takes Visa, Mastercard, American Express, PayPal or a transfer — with US$1 credited when the account opens, before any payment method is entered.
The “Open site” buttons are advertising links: buy on the other side and this site earns a commission at no extra cost to you. Nothing was tested on pictures — what the editors checked is the terms each service publishes about itself.
In pesos
What the name costs today
Three published tariffs cover most of what anyone searching this word is actually after.
A picture runs between ₱0.30 and ₱19 across the category. The cheap end is a small model at WaveSpeed, which prices each engine it rents separately and credits US$1 — about ₱63 — when an account opens. The dear end is an Ainudez picture on its ₱630 entry pack, 15 credits each at a rate that does not change on larger packs. Undresswith sits between them at roughly ₱4, and ₱1.60 at its top tier, which is the only volume discount published anywhere here.
Peso figures use ₱63 to the dollar and every tariff is billed in US dollars, with your bank's conversion cut on top. Two of the six take a card at checkout and the rest settle in cryptocurrency or inside the account; no readable payment list names GCash or Maya, although a Visa card issued by either goes through wherever cards are accepted. The full six-way comparison is in the full six-way comparison, and what each engine claims underneath is in what each engine will state.
Fifty dollars, then and now
What the original price buys on today's tariffs
The paid build of the 2019 program cost fifty dollars once — about ₱3,150 at today's rate. Spent on the three published tariffs instead, that sum goes a long way.
Undresswith: roughly 790 pictures. At about ₱4 a run on the ₱1,260 entry pack, ₱3,150 covers two and a half packs, and since gems carry no expiry date the balance sits there until it is used. At the US$199.99 tier the same money would buy considerably more, because the rate falls to ₱1.60 a picture.
Ainudez: about 166 pictures. At ₱19 a run from ₱630 packs of 500 credits, ₱3,150 is five packs and a flat rate that does not improve with volume. Predictable, and the most expensive per piece of the three.
WaveSpeed: between 358 and 10,500 runs. At ₱0.30 to ₱8.80 apiece the spread is enormous, and it is entirely a matter of which model you send the job to. The US$1 credited when an account opens costs nothing to test first.
Expectation against reality
What is DeepNude to the people searching it now
Three expectations account for most of the traffic to the name, and each one meets something different when it arrives.
A program to download. What exists instead is six websites, none of which ships an installer for Windows or Mac. That is not a restriction they imposed on themselves: running an image model locally means tens of gigabytes of weights and a graphics card bought for the job, which is why the whole category rents hardware and charges per attempt.
Something free. What exists is a welcome balance on three of the six — 100 gems at Undresswith, about one picture; coins at UndressHer; a dollar at WaveSpeed — and Ainudez states plainly that it credits nothing. Enough to watch the process work end to end, and not enough to judge an output.
The original, improved. What exists is unrelated software from unrelated companies, priced by the piece and readable in advance on three of them. Anything advertising itself as the 2019 build restored is advertising a file whose contents nobody has checked, and whose price is never printed anywhere.
Then against now
Three differences that matter commercially
Not a historical comparison — these are the three that change what you pay and what you are exposed to.
Where the work happens
On your machine then, on somebody's server now.
- an entry-level phone performs as well as an expensive laptop;
- the file has to leave your device for the job to run at all;
- what that means for the result: the file and its shelf life.
How it is paid for
One purchase then, a balance spent per attempt now.
- credits come off per run rather than per success;
- one service publishes a refund window: fourteen calendar days to ask;
- where the rest of the money goes: the five ways it disappears.
What you install
A program then, nothing at all now.
- every one of the six runs in a browser tab;
- an icon under this name opens the same page: what the stores allow;
- a file offered instead is something else: what is inside an APK.
One last thing
What a page claiming to be the original is selling
The claim is common, it is always made retroactively, and what follows it is usually one of three transactions.
A file to install, an activation key bought in a private conversation, or a subscription whose price appears only on the payment screen. None of the six working services needs any of those, because all six run in a browser and charge by the piece — and three of them print that price before you have registered for anything.
The useful test takes ten seconds and does not involve the history at all. Look for a price per picture and a company name on the same site. Addresses that have both rarely describe themselves as official, and addresses that lead with the word rarely have either. The other distinction worth keeping straight while you are there is between building a figure from a description and editing somebody's photograph, which look identical on a price list and are not remotely the same thing afterwards: two operations behind one word.