
What comes back
DeepNude results: resolution, watermarks and what happens to the file
DeepNude results arrive in the same tab and are charged per attempt, not per success. Two services put hours against the file; one puts days against your money.
Short answer
DeepNude results come back to the same browser tab that sent the file, usually within a minute or two, and they are charged per attempt rather than per success. Two services put a number of hours against them: Undresswith deletes an upload after twenty-four, Deep Undress keeps a finished result available for seventy-two.
Resolution and watermarking are things the first run shows you, and nothing here is invented in advance of it. What every service does put in writing are the clocks, the input rules and the price of trying again.
What arrives
What DeepNude results actually are
A file in the tab, an entry in a history, and a charge against a balance. Three things happen at once and only one of them is visible.
The file itself. It returns to the same page you uploaded from, ready to save, and once saved it is an ordinary image or clip on your device like any other. No service in the group publishes the resolution it returns, so the only way to know is to buy one run and look — which is exactly why the price of a single run matters more than the price of a pack.
The entry in your history. Every service keeps a record of the job inside the account, and that record outlives the file on every one of them. Clearing it is a manual step, it takes about a minute, and it is the only part of the whole chain you control directly.
The charge. The balance comes off when the job runs, not when you like the outcome. UndressHer is the only entry publishing a refund window — fourteen calendar days to ask, fourteen working days to be paid — and everywhere else a spent credit is spent, because the computing has already happened.
Numbers in writing
Four clocks published across the six
Each measures something different, and together they are the only quantities anyone in this category has committed to on paper.
24 hours on what you send
Undresswith holds an upload encrypted for a day at most and then deletes it. It is the only input clock in the group, and the single largest reason its card sits first on the ranking.
72 hours on what comes back
Deep Undress keeps the finished result retrievable for three days. That covers the file it produced, not the one you gave it, and the two clauses are separate.
5 working days on a complaint
Ainudez commits to a reply inside a business week, which is the only response deadline published anywhere here — and the cheapest thing on this list to test.
14 days on the money
UndressHer's refund window, fourteen calendar days to ask and fourteen working to pay. Where a service settles in cryptocurrency there is no equivalent, because a confirmed payment cannot be reversed: where the money goes.
Input decides output
What goes in, and what that settles
Two services publish their intake rules in full, and those rules tell you more about the result than any promise on a homepage would.
Pictures. Undresswith takes JPG, PNG, WebP and AVIF; Deep Undress takes JPG, PNG, WebP and BMP; both stop at 20 MB. A file over the ceiling is refused rather than shrunk, so the run is not spent — but the upload is, and on a slow connection that is the expensive part of the exercise.
Clips. Deep Undress accepts MP4 or MOV up to 50 MB, starts metering at the fifth second and stops processing at the twentieth, which means anything longer is uploaded and quietly ignored. Ainudez refuses outright past seven seconds and caps resolution at 720p. Trimming before you send is therefore not tidiness, it is the difference between paying for output you receive and paying for output you do not.
And the ceiling is the honest part. A published limit is a statement about what the engine can do, made in advance and in writing — which is more than any accuracy claim in this category amounts to. Nothing on this site publishes a measurement of output quality, because nobody outside these companies is in a position to take one.
The price of trying again
What a second attempt costs
Since nobody publishes what a result looks like, the number that matters is what it costs to run the job twice.
About ₱8 at Undresswith. Two runs at roughly ₱4 each on the ₱1,260 entry pack, or about ₱3.20 for the pair at the US$199.99 tier. Gems carry no expiry date, so a pack bought for one project is still there for the next one.
About ₱38 at Ainudez. Two runs at 15 credits apiece from a ₱630 pack of 500 credits, at a rate that does not improve on a larger purchase. It is the most expensive per attempt of the three published tariffs, and the most predictable.
₱0.60 to ₱17.60 at WaveSpeed. Two runs at ₱0.30 to ₱8.80 each, depending on which model you send them to — and the US$1 credited at sign-up, about ₱63, covers several attempts before a card is needed. Peso figures here use ₱63 to the dollar. A clip is a different calculation entirely, since it is billed by the second or by the credit: the per-second arithmetic, and where the welcome balance stops is in how far a welcome balance goes.
After you close the tab
What outlives the picture
The result is the short-lived part. Three things around it last considerably longer, and all three are described in the services' own documents.
The account record. Registration details, payment history and the addresses you connected from are kept on the order of years — seven, where Undresswith spells it out — against twenty-four hours for the file itself. Those are different clauses doing different jobs, and it is worth reading both rather than one.
The metadata inside your own file. A photograph carries the device it was taken on, the date and sometimes the coordinates, and uploading forwards all of it. That travels with the picture regardless of which service receives it, and regardless of what the site is calling itself this month: why the labels keep changing.
Whatever left the account afterwards. A file sent onward to a chat or a channel is outside every retention clause on this page, and outside your control entirely — what a chat handle keeps on record. The full set of published terms, side by side, is in price, payment and clocks compared; what each engine says about itself is in the rate and the input rules; and the split between editing a real photograph and building one from a description is in two operations behind one word. Where the sign-up wall stands on each service is in what happens after you log in.
Two minutes afterwards
Four steps once the result is on your device
None of this is complicated, and all four are steps only you can take.
- Download it inside the window. Where a service publishes one — seventy-two hours at Deep Undress — the clock starts when the job finishes, not when you next open the tab. Past that, the only way back is to pay for the run again.
- Clear the run history in the account. It is a manual step on every service in the category, it takes about a minute, and nothing does it for you. It does not reach any copy already on their side, which is precisely why the published retention clause is worth reading first.
- Check what your own file was carrying. Device, capture date and sometimes coordinates travel inside a photograph. That is worth knowing before an upload rather than after one.
- Decide before you send anything onward. A file forwarded into a chat leaves every retention clause on this page behind, and the wording of the Safe Spaces Act turns on the act of sharing rather than on how the file was produced.
If a result is of you
When the file is about somebody who did not agree
Retention clauses stop being the question at that point. Two things decide what happens next, and the first one is an order of operations.
Copy the evidence first
A successful report removes the material and the proof of it in the same move.
- the full address of every post, saved as text rather than memory;
- screenshots showing the address bar and the visible time;
- the names of the accounts and channels carrying it;
- blocking an account before copying the address erases the trail.
Then three routes, in parallel
They travel differently, so none of them waits for the others.
- the platform hosting it, through its own reporting form;
- the PNP Anti-Cybercrime Group or the NBI Cybercrime Division;
- the National Privacy Commission, where personal data is involved;
- each request, written out: how to get an image taken down.