Four labels, one run
Undress AI, DeepNude, clothes remover: one run, four names
Undress AI, DeepNude, nudify, clothes remover: four names for one operation at one price. What changes with the label is the advertising, not the engine.
Short answer
Undress AI, DeepNude, nudify and clothes remover are four names for the same operation, and the label changes far more often than the machinery does. Services rotate between them because advertising rules and search demand move, not because anything underneath has been rebuilt — and the price is the same whichever word is on the homepage: ₱0.30 to ₱19 a run.
What does differ between them is how much each service prints before taking money. Three of the six publish a full tariff outside the account; the rest open it once you are inside.
Four words, one job
Why undress AI and DeepNude name the same thing
Each label arrived for a commercial reason rather than a technical one, and knowing which is which saves comparing two pages that sell an identical service.
DeepNude is the oldest and the most searched. It comes from a desktop program released in 2019 and withdrawn by its author days later, and it survives as a query rather than a product: what the original actually was. Nothing running today descends from it.
Undress AI is the replacement term. Plainer, more descriptive and easier to advertise, it became the default label as the older word got harder to place. It describes the same operation on the same rented hardware.
Nudify and clothes remover are the newest. Both are search terms first and product names second, and both appear on sites that also answer to the other two. A service using all four on one page is optimising, not offering four things.
What the word never changes
Four things that stay identical under every label
Whichever name a site has chosen, these four are fixed, and they are the four worth comparing.
The work happens elsewhere
All six compute on their own servers, which is why every one of them opens in a browser and why an old handset performs as well as a new laptop: what the browser route asks for.
You are billed per attempt
The balance comes off per run, not per success, on every service in the category. One publishes a refund window — fourteen calendar days to ask, fourteen working days to be paid — and the rest treat a spent credit as spent.
The file leaves your device
Whatever the site is called, the upload is the moment that matters, and two services put a number of hours against it: what happens to the file.
Nothing installs
None of the six ships a desktop program and neither store carries the category, so an icon under any of the four names opens the same page: what the stores allow.
Same job, published price
Three services that print the rate whatever they call it
Order follows the editorial scale used across this guide, which counts how much of a service is readable before it charges you.
-
1Ladder publishedUndresswith
Prints the whole gem ladder before registration — 100 to 110 gems a run, about ₱4 on the ₱1,260 entry pack, ₱1.60 at the top tier — and accepts JPG, PNG, WebP and AVIF up to 20 MB. The file you send is held twenty-four hours and then deleted.
-
2Limits in fullDeep Undress
The most detailed intake published in the group: JPG, PNG, WebP and BMP to 20 MB, MP4 or MOV to 50 MB, metered from the fifth second and processed to the twentieth, with a finished result kept available for seventy-two hours.
-
3One rate, every tierAinudez
15 credits a run and ₱630 for 500 credits, unchanged on larger packs, with clips from the same balance at 50 to 300 credits up to 720p and seven seconds. It publishes five working days as the deadline for answering a complaint.
The “Open site” buttons are advertising links: buy on the other side and this site earns a commission at no extra cost to you. Nothing was tested on output — what the editors checked is the terms each service publishes about itself.
The rate under the label
What a DeepNude undress AI run costs, whatever it is called
Three published tariffs, three different units, and a forty-fold spread between the cheapest and the dearest run.
₱0.30 to ₱8.80 at WaveSpeed, priced model by model, so the figure is a choice rather than a fixed rate. A new account opens with US$1 already credited, about ₱63, and a card works at checkout — which is also where a GCash or Maya Visa card goes through, since no readable payment list in the category names either wallet directly.
About ₱4 at Undresswith, on its ₱1,260 entry pack, falling to ₱1.60 at the US$199.99 tier. That is the only volume discount published anywhere in the group, and the gems buying it carry no expiry date.
About ₱19 at Ainudez, from a ₱630 pack of 500 credits at 15 credits a run, unchanged on every larger purchase. Peso figures here use ₱63 to the dollar and every tariff is billed in US dollars, with your bank's conversion cut on top. The full six-way comparison is in price, payment and clocks side by side, clips are priced separately in what a clip costs, and where the free balance stops is in what the welcome credits cover.
Fifty runs, three bills
What a month of regular use costs
Fifty runs is a fair test of a habit rather than a curiosity. Priced on the three published tariffs, the gap between them stops being academic.
Undresswith: about ₱200. Fifty runs at roughly ₱4 each, comfortably inside a single ₱1,260 pack that would cover six months at that pace. At the US$199.99 tier the same fifty cost about ₱80, which is where the volume discount starts to earn its keep — and since gems do not expire, buying ahead is a question of cash flow rather than deadlines.
Ainudez: ₱950. Fifty runs at 15 credits each is 750 credits, which needs two ₱630 packs — ₱1,260 spent to use ₱950 of it. The rate is identical on any size of purchase, so this is simply what fifty runs cost there, every month, with no tier to grow into.
WaveSpeed: between ₱15 and ₱440. Fifty runs at ₱0.30 to ₱8.80 apiece, and the spread is entirely your own choice of model. Nothing else in the category hands the cost decision to the buyer like that, and the US$1 credited at sign-up covers the first few before a card is involved at all.
Matching the job
Which of them suits which kind of use
Three common patterns, and the entry whose published terms answer each one best.
Trying it once
Spend nothing and see the whole route from upload to download.
- WaveSpeed credits US$1, about ₱63, with no card required;
- Undresswith credits 100 gems after email verification, about one run;
- three of the six credit something at sign-up, and one states it credits nothing.
Using it regularly
The unit price is the number that matters once the novelty goes.
- Undresswith is the cheapest per run at ₱4, and ₱1.60 at its top tier;
- gems carry no expiry date, so a large pack is storage rather than a deadline;
- a clip is billed at the price of twenty runs.
Wanting somewhere to complain
Only some of these have written down anything you could hold them to.
- Ainudez answers a complaint within five working days;
- UndressHer publishes a fourteen-day refund window and names a company;
- WaveSpeed takes a card, which leaves an issuer in the middle.
Reading a homepage
What the label promises, and what it delivers
Two lists, drawn from the same set of documents. The left one is what a name can honestly tell you; the right one is what it cannot.
Worth reading
- A price per run, printed before the sign-up form.
- Formats and a size ceiling for what goes in.
- A clip limit, where video is accepted at all.
- A deadline with a number: hours on a file, days on a refund.
- A company named in the terms, on two of the six.
Worth ignoring
- The choice of label, which follows search demand.
- Claims of accuracy: nobody outside these firms measures it.
- Claims of speed, for the same reason.
- Any suggestion of descent from the 2019 program.
- The word “official”, which every copy also uses.
Which engine each service names, and what that does and does not settle, is in what each engine will state. The other split worth keeping straight — building from a description against editing a real photograph — is in two operations behind one word, and what Philippine law makes of the second is in the statutes that apply here.