Two different jobs
DeepNude generator
How text generation differs from photo editing, and how each is billed.
Short answer
A DeepNude generator means one of two different operations, and the word covers both. One builds a figure from a written description and involves no real person at all; the other edits a photograph of someone who exists. Search puts them on the same shelf, the services often sell both, and only the second one leaves a trail that leads back to a person.
The price is the same either way — ₱0.30 to ₱19 a run across the category — so the distinction is not commercial. It is everything else.
Two jobs, one word
What a DeepNude generator is actually doing
The two operations share an interface, a price list and usually a homepage. Nothing else about them is alike.
Building from a description
Text goes in, a figure comes out, and nobody's photograph was involved.
- the input is a sentence, not a file;
- the result resembles nobody in particular unless it was steered to;
- it is the same machinery every image model uses;
- the cost is a single run, at whatever the service charges for one.
Editing an existing photograph
A file goes in, the same face comes back, and that is the entire difference.
- the input is somebody's picture, with its metadata attached;
- the output is recognisable as that person, which is the point of it;
- the file travels to a server and is governed by that service's retention clause;
- the cost is the same run, and the consequences are not: what Philippine law covers.
What each run costs
The rate does not care which operation you chose
Three services publish the number before you register, and in each case it covers both jobs identically.
Ainudez. 15 credits a run, 500 credits for ₱630, so about ₱19 a piece and the same on every larger pack. Video comes off the same balance at 50 to 300 credits, capped at 720p and seven seconds, which makes it the easiest tariff in the group to budget against because there is only one number to remember.
Undresswith. 100 to 110 gems a run, roughly ₱4 on the ₱1,260 entry pack and ₱1.60 at the US$199.99 tier — the only volume discount published anywhere here. Gems carry no expiry date, and a clip is billed at what twenty runs cost.
WaveSpeed. ₱0.30 to ₱8.80 a run, priced model by model, so the cost depends on which engine you point at the job. A new account opens with US$1 — about ₱63 — already credited, which is enough to try both operations before deciding anything: what the welcome credits cover.
Priced before you choose
Three services that publish the rate for either job
Order follows the editorial scale used across this guide, which counts how much of a service is readable before it charges you.
-
1Window of accessDeep Undress
Sells five fixed lengths of access rather than a quantity of runs, each bought once with nothing renewing, and publishes its intake in full: JPG, PNG, WebP and BMP to 20 MB, MP4 or MOV to 50 MB, with a finished result kept for seventy-two hours.
-
2Flat credit rateAinudez
Charges 15 credits a picture on every tier, with 500 credits for ₱630, so a run costs the same whether it is your first or your hundredth. Clips come off the same balance at 50 to 300 credits, capped at 720p and seven seconds, and a complaint is answered within five working days.
-
3Model by modelWaveSpeed
The only entry that lets you choose the engine and see its price first: ₱0.30 to ₱8.80 a run, ₱0.60 to ₱9.50 a second of video. Two registered companies sign the terms, a card works at checkout, and US$1 arrives with the account.
The “Open site” buttons are advertising links: buy on the other side and this site earns a commission at no extra cost to you. Nothing was tested on output — what the editors checked is the terms each service publishes about itself.
Twenty runs, three tariffs
What a first session costs on each
Twenty runs is roughly what it takes to work out whether a service suits you at all. Here is the bill on each of the three published tariffs.
WaveSpeed: between ₱6 and ₱176. Twenty runs at ₱0.30 to ₱8.80 apiece, and where you land inside that range is your own choice of model rather than the service's. The US$1 credited at sign-up, about ₱63, covers the cheaper half of the session before a card is needed, which makes it the least expensive way to try both operations side by side.
Undresswith: about ₱80. Twenty runs at roughly ₱4 each on the ₱1,260 entry pack. The session is small change against the pack, so the real question is the pack itself — and since the gems carry no expiry date, the leftover is stored rather than lost. At the US$199.99 tier the same twenty runs cost about ₱32.
Ainudez: ₱380. Twenty runs at 15 credits each is 300 credits, which is more than half of a ₱630 pack. The rate never improves on a larger purchase, so this is the figure whether you buy once or monthly — predictable, and the most expensive per piece of the three.
Where the two diverge
Why the distinction matters after the run, not during it
Both operations produce a file. Only one of them produces a file about a particular person.
Building a figure from a description leaves a result that resembles no one, and nothing in it points outward. Editing a photograph does the opposite by design: the output is useful precisely because it is recognisable, which is also what brings it inside the Safe Spaces Act, whose wording turns on consent and on the act of sharing rather than on how the file was produced.
The practical side is simpler. A photograph carries metadata — device, capture date, sometimes coordinates — and it belongs to the person in it rather than to whoever is holding the file. Sending someone else's picture to a service is processing another person's personal data, which is why the operator row on any comparison matters as much as the price row: who publishes a company name, side by side. What the services themselves say about what they keep is in what comes back, and where it goes.
Reading the page
Telling which one a site is selling
Most pages in this category advertise both operations without saying so. Three signals separate them in about ten seconds.
Look at the first input it asks for. A box for a sentence and a box for a file are different products, and whichever one the interface leads with is the one the service is built around. Where each site stops you on the way in is in the sign-up wall.
Look at what it publishes about intake. A service that lists picture formats and a size ceiling is expecting files: JPG, PNG, WebP and BMP up to 20 MB at Deep Undress, JPG, PNG, WebP and AVIF at Undresswith. A pure text-to-image tool has nothing to say on the subject.
Look at the video clause. Clip limits — 720p and seven seconds, or 50 MB and a meter that starts at the fifth second — only exist where real recordings go in: what a clip costs. What each engine claims to run underneath is a separate question again, taken up in which model each one names, and the labels the whole category rotates through are in why the names keep changing.
Before the first run
Four things to settle in advance
Four questions, all answerable from the page in front of you, and every one of them cheaper to ask now than later.
Which operation you are buying
A description or a file. The interface answers this before the tariff does, and the answer determines everything that happens after the result appears.
What one run costs
Per piece, not per pack: ₱0.30 to ₱19 across the category. Three of the six print it before registration; the rest open the tariff once the account exists.
How the money travels
Two of the six take a card, which is where a GCash or Maya Visa card goes through; the rest settle in cryptocurrency, where a confirmed payment cannot be reversed. Peso figures here use ₱63 to the dollar.
What you are actually installing
Nothing, if you stay in a browser — all six run there. An icon offering the same thing is usually the same page: what a store listing really opens, and where none of this came from is in the program of 2019.